quarta-feira, 10 de junho de 2020

Networking | Switching And Routing | Tutorial 3 | 2018


Welcome to my 3rd new tutorial of networking (Routing and Switching). In this blog you will able to watch an interesting video about basic device navigation such as changing device (router or switch) name, configuration of login password, configuring a device information, router IP addresses and many more.

What is router?

Router is a network layer device which is the 3rd layer in the OSI model which is used to communicate different networks. It is an intelligent device fixed at the boundary of network that connects to other networks and responsible for end to end delivery of the packet that requires an IP address which is known as the logical address which is the basic identity of the device just like our identity card number or roll number and so on, for the identification of source and destination devices. Router is the gateway of the network having two interfaces such as inbound and the outbound interface through which the traffic comes in from different networks and comes out traffic to the different networks.

What is an IP address?

Internet protocol (IP) address is a numeric label given to each and every device in the network for the identification of the device just like our roll numbers in collages, universities which identity each and every student uniquely everywhere. So same concept here, it is a logical address which is used whenever the device want to communicate outside the network that means to another network.

What is Switch?

Switch is basically layer 2 device, which is used to connect two or more than two devices with each other in the same network. It is an intelligent device which doesn't allow the broadcast. It requires Media access control (MAC) address to communicate within the network. Now let's move to the video for further.



RapidScan's screenshots:
RapidScan helping menu
RapidScan Intro
RapidScan Outro

How to contribute?
If you want to contribute to the author. Read this.

More articles

Why (I Believe) WADA Was Not Hacked By The Russians

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion. I am not an expert in attribution. But as it turns out, not many people in the world are good at attribution. I know this post lacks real evidence and is mostly based on speculation.



Let's start with the main facts we know about the WADA hack, in chronological order:


1. Some point in time (August - September 2016), the WADA database has been hacked and exfiltrated
2. August 15th, "WADA has alerted their stakeholders that email phishing scams are being reported in connection with WADA and therefore asks its recipients to be careful"  https://m.paralympic.org/news/wada-warns-stakeholders-phishing-scams
3. September 1st, the fancybear.net domain has been registered
   Domain Name: FANCYBEAR.NET
...
Updated Date: 18-sep-2016
Creation Date: 01-sep-2016
4. The content of the WADA hack has been published on the website
5. The @FancyBears and @FancyBearsHT Twitter accounts have been created and started to tweet on 12th September, reaching out to journalists
6. 12th September, Western media started headlines "Russia hacked WADA"
7. The leaked documents have been altered, states WADA https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/2016-10/cyber-security-update-wadas-incident-response


The Threatconnect analysis

The only technical analysis on why Russia was behind the hack, can be read here: https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/fancy-bear-anti-doping-agency-phishing/

After reading this, I was able to collect the following main points:

  1. It is Russia because Russian APT groups are capable of phishing
  2. It is Russia because the phishing site "wada-awa[.]org was registered and uses a name server from ITitch[.]com, a domain registrar that FANCY BEAR actors recently used"
  3. It is Russia because "Wada-arna[.]org and tas-cass[.]org were registered through and use name servers from Domains4bitcoins[.]com, a registrar that has also been associated with FANCY BEAR activity."
  4. It is Russia, because "The registration of these domains on August 3rd and 8th, 2016 are consistent with the timeline in which the WADA recommended banning all Russian athletes from the Olympic and Paralympic games."
  5. It is Russia, because "The use of 1&1 mail.com webmail addresses to register domains matches a TTP we previously identified for FANCY BEAR actors."

There is an interesting side-track in the article, the case of the @anpoland account. Let me deal with this at the end of this post.

My problem with the above points is that all five flag was publicly accessible to anyone as TTP's for Fancy Bear. And meanwhile, all five is weak evidence. Any script kittie in the world is capable of both hacking WADA and planting these false-flags.

A stronger than these weak pieces of evidence would be:

  • Malware sharing same code attributed to Fancy Bear (where the code is not publicly available or circulating on hackforums)
  • Private servers sharing the IP address with previous attacks attributed to Fancy Bear (where the server is not a hacked server or a proxy used by multiple parties)
  • E-mail addresses used to register the domain attributed to Fancy Bear
  • Many other things
For me, it is quite strange that after such great analysis on Guccifer 2.0, the Threatconnect guys came up with this low-value post. 


The fancybear website

It is quite unfortunate that the analysis was not updated after the documents have been leaked. But let's just have a look at the fancybear . net website, shall we?

Now the question is, if you are a Russian state-sponsored hacker group, and you are already accused of the hack itself, do you create a website with tons of bears on the website, and do you choose the same name (Fancy Bear) for your "Hack team" that is already used by Crowdstrike to refer to a Russian state-sponsored hacker group? Well, for me, it makes no sense. Now I can hear people screaming: "The Russians changed tactics to confuse us". Again, it makes no sense to change tactics on this, while keeping tactics on the "evidence" found by Threatconnect.

It makes sense that a Russian state-sponsored group creates a fake persona, names it Guccifer 2.0, pretends Guccifer 2.0 is from Romania, but in the end it turns out Guccifer 2.0 isn't a native Romanian speaker. That really makes sense.

What happens when someone creates this fancybear website for leaking the docs, and from the Twitter account reaches out to the media? Journalists check the website, they see it was done by Fancy Bear, they Bing Google this name, and clearly see it is a Russian state-sponsored hacker group. Some journalists also found the Threatconnect report, which seems very convincing for the first read. I mean, it is a work of experts, right? So you can write in the headlines that the hack was done by the Russians.

Just imagine an expert in the USA or Canada writing in report for WADA:
"the hack was done by non-Russian, but state-sponsored actors, who planted a lot of false-flags to accuse the Russians and to destroy confidence in past and future leaks". Well, I am sure this is not a popular opinion, and whoever tries this, risks his career. Experts are human, subject to all kinds of bias.

The Guardian

The only other source I was able to find is from The Guardian, where not just one side (it was Russia) was represented in the article. It is quite unfortunate that both experts are from Russia - so people from USA will call them being not objective on the matter. But the fact that they are Russian experts does not mean they are not true ...

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/sep/15/fancy-bears-hackers--russia-wada-tues-leaks

Sergei Nikitin:
"We don't have this in the case of the DNC and Wada hacks, so it's not clear on what basis conclusions are being drawn that Russian hackers or special services were involved. It's done on the basis of the website design, which is absurd," he said, referring to the depiction of symbolically Russian animals, brown and white bears, on the "Fancy Bears' Hack Team" website.

I don't agree with the DNC part, but this is not the topic of conversation here.

Alexander Baranov:
"the hackers were most likely amateurs who published a "semi-finished product" rather than truly compromising information. "They could have done this more harshly and suddenly," he said. "If it was [state-sponsored] hackers, they would have dug deeper. Since it's enthusiasts, amateurs, they got what they got and went public with it.""

The @anpoland side-track

First please check the tas-cas.org hack https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=day5Aq0bHsA  , I will be here when you finished it. This is a website for "Court of Arbitration for Sport's", and referring to the Threatconnect post, "CAS is the highest international tribunal that was established to settle disputes related to sport through arbitration. Starting in 2016, an anti-doping division of CAS began judging doping cases at the Olympic Games, replacing the IOC disciplinary commission." Now you can see why this attack is also discussed here.


  • My bet is that this machine was set-up for these @anpoland videos only. Whether google.ru is a false flag or it is real, hard to decide. It is interesting to see that there is no google search done via google.ru, it is used only once. 
  • The creator of the video can't double click. Is it because he has a malfunctioning mouse? Is it because he uses a virtualization console, which is near-perfect OPSEC to hide your real identity? My personal experience is that using virtualization consoles remotely (e.g. RDP) has very similar effects to what we can see on the video. 
  • The timeline of the Twitter account is quite strange, registered in 2010
  • I agree with the Threatconnect analysis that this @anpoland account is probably a faketivist, and not an activist. But who is behind it, remains a mystery. 
  • Either the "activist" is using a whonix-like setup for remaining anonymous, or a TOR router (something like this), or does not care about privacy at all. Looking at the response times (SQLmap, web browser), I doubt this "activist" is behind anything related to TOR. Which makes no sense for an activist, who publishes his hack on Youtube. People are stupid for sure, but this does not add up. It makes sense that this was a server (paid by bitcoins or stolen credit cards or whatever) rather than a home computer.
For me, this whole @anpoland thing makes no sense, and I think it is just loosely connected to the WADA hack. 

The mysterious Korean characters in the HTML source

There is another interesting flag in the whole story, which actually makes no sense. When the website was published, there were Korean characters in HTML comments. 



When someone pointed this out on Twitter, these Korean HTML comments disappeared:
These HTML comments look like generated HTML comments, from a WYSIWYG editor, which is using the Korean language. Let me know if you can identify the editor.

The Russians are denying it

Well, what choice they have? It does not matter if they did this or not, they will deny it. And they can't deny this differently. Just imagine a spokesperson: "Previously we have falsely denied the DCC and DNC hacks, but this time please believe us, this wasn't Russia." Sounds plausible ...

Attribution

Let me sum up what we know:

It makes sense that the WADA hack was done by Russia, because:

  1. Russia being almost banned from the Olympics due to doping scandal, it made sense to discredit WADA and US Olympians
  2. There are multiple(weak) pieces of evidence which point to Russia
It makes sense that the WADA hack was not done by  Russia, because: 
  1. By instantly attributing the hack to the Russians, the story was more about to discredit Russia than discrediting WADA or US Olympians.
  2. In reality, there was no gain for Russia for disclosing the documents. Nothing happened, nothing changed, no discredit for WADA. Not a single case turned out to be illegal or unethical.
  3. Altering the leaked documents makes no sense if it was Russia (see update at the end). Altering the leaked documents makes a lot of sense if it was not Russia. Because from now on, people can always state "these leaks cannot be trusted, so it is not true what is written there". It is quite cozy for any US organization, who has been hacked or will be hacked. If you are interested in the "Russians forging leaked documents" debate, I highly recommend to start with this The Intercept article
  4. If the Korean characters were false flags planted by the Russians, why would they remove it? If it had been Russian characters, I would understand removing it.
  5. All evidence against Russia is weak, can be easily forged by even any script kittie.

I don't like guessing, but here is my guess. This WADA hack was an operation of a (non-professional) hackers-for-hire service, paid by an enemy of Russia. The goal was to hack WADA, leak the documents, modify some contents in the documents, and blame it all on the Russians ...

Questions and answers

  • Was Russia capable of doing this WADA hack? Yes.
  • Was Russia hacking WADA? Maybe yes, maybe not.
  • Was this leak done by a Russian state-sponsored hacker group? I highly doubt that.
  • Is it possible to buy an attribution-dice where all six-side is Russia? No, it is sold-out. 

To quote Patrick Gray: "Russia is the new China, and the Russians ate my homework."©

Let me know what you think about this, and please comment. 

Continue reading


segunda-feira, 8 de junho de 2020

Cómo Descargar Y Activar VídeoProc 4K "Licencia Gratis"

En el mundo del diseño y la edición podemos encontrar bastantes herramientas que nos faciliten de manera rápida composiciones increíbles sin acudir a programas potentes o pesados que nuestra computadora no puede soportar. En este corto artículo queremos recomendar un excelente software para la edición de vídeo, con exigencias mínimas para crear proyectos profesionales de forma dinámica.
Se trata de VideoProc un programa para la edición de Vídeo en 4K, un editor magnifico para aquellas personas que quieren iniciar en el mundo audiovisual, ya que su interfaz es completamente sencilla pudiendo ubicar las herramientas necesarias para lograr proyectos de calidad sin esfuerzo alguno. Te explicamos todas sus ventajas con relación a otros software de alto nivel o costosos.
https://www.dominatupc.com.co/
Si eres principiante y no cuenta con un programa para realizar sus proyectos, este post es su indicado y procesar en alta definición es la mejor alternativa sin acudir a programas como Adobe Premiere que podría no ser una opción para  personas aficionadas. Agregar efectos, cortar, rotar, combinar y renderizar en 4k manteniendo la misma calidad original, VideoProc te brinda estas posibilidades y más.
Es un programa ligero en procesamiento de vídeo que trae en conjunto con una suite de herramientas para convertir Audio/vídeo de DVD, una grabadora de vídeo y un descargador de contenido en línea. Es realmente un editor único, potente y liviano que para ser gratis es realmente una bomba, ya que funciona sin problemas hasta en computadoras con pocos recursos.

Características disponibles y ventajas sobre otro software

  • Puede hacer copia de seguridad de DVD/Imagen iSO CDR a MP4(H264,HEVC)
  • Puede cambiar formatos y resolución, compartir archivos de vídeo, ajustar VBR/CBR, Bit Rate etc...
  • Tiene un motor de descargar de audio y vídeo integrado permitiendo guardar contenido de YouTube u otros sitios
  • La grabadora te permite grabar vlogs, juegos desde la pantalla de tu ordenador, iPhone, iPad o cámara Web conectada
https://www.dominatupc.com.co/
Aunque se relacionan las más importantes son muchas las opciones que tiene el programa y que tú mismo poco a poco puede ir descubriendo. A continuación te mostraremos la forma de poder instalar de manera gratuita con un código estragado por el mismo desarrollador y por tiempo limitado en solo dos (2) pasos.
  1. Descarga VideoProc dando clic aquí
  2. Ejecute el programa e ingrese el correo electrónico valido, seguidamente ingrese el código de activación (serial) DALZQ-243P7-5Q66J-UPURF y presione activar.
De esta manera ya contamos con todas las funciones de forma gratuita, para editar y convertir vídeos en 4k grandes. También te puede interesar:(Cómo descargar y activar toda la suite de Adobe)


Continue reading

domingo, 7 de junho de 2020

Tishna: An Automated Pentest Framework For Web Servers, Web Applications To Web Security

About Tishna:
   Tishna is complete automated pentest framework for web servers, application layer to web security.

   Tishna was tested on: Kali Linux, Parrot Security OS, Black Arch, Termux, Android Led TV.


Tishna's interface: Tishna has 62 options with full automation and can be use for web security swiss knife.

Tishna's installation: First, boot your Kali Linux or Parrot Security OS up. Then open Terminal and enter these commands

Appeared:
  • Cyber Space (Computer Security).
  • Terror Security (Computer Security).
  • National Cyber Security Services.

Brief Introduction
  • Tishna is useful in Banks, Private Organisations and Ethical hacker personnel for legal auditing.
  • It serves as a defense method to find as much as information possible for gaining unauthorised access and intrusion.
  • With the emergence of more advanced technology, cybercriminals have also found more ways to get into the system of many organizations.
  • Tishna software can audit, servers and web behaviour.
  • Tishna can perform Scanning & Enumeration as much as possible of target.
  • It's first step to stop cyber criminals by securing your Servers and Web Application Security.
  • Tishna is false positive free, when there is something it will show no matter what, if it is not, it will give blank results rather error.

Developer

Support to the coder
   You can sponsor and support via BTC.
   The bitcoin address: 3BuUYgEgsRuEra4GwqNVLKnDCTjLEDfptu
qr code

Continue reading
  1. Hacker Website
  2. Hacking Online Games
  3. Hacking For Dummies
  4. Hacking Page
  5. Pentest Usb
  6. Hacking Jailbreak
  7. Pentest +
  8. Pentest Tools Github
  9. Hacker News
  10. Hacking Process

sábado, 6 de junho de 2020

New USBCulprit Espionage Tool Steals Data From Air-Gapped Computers

A Chinese threat actor has developed new capabilities to target air-gapped systems in an attempt to exfiltrate sensitive data for espionage, according to a newly published research by Kaspersky yesterday. The APT, known as Cycldek, Goblin Panda, or Conimes, employs an extensive toolset for lateral movement and information stealing in victim networks, including previously unreported custom

via The Hacker NewsRelated news
  1. Hacker Kevin Mitnick
  2. Pentest Hardware
  3. Pentest Process
  4. Hacking Games
  5. Pentest +
  6. Pentest Services
  7. Pentest Open Source

HOW TO HACK A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT? STEP BY STEP

Phishing is the way to obtain sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, and credit card details or any other confidential information, often for malicious reasons, by disguising as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication. Phishing is typically carried out by several ways like email spoofing or instant messaging, and it often directs users to enter personal information at a fake website, the look and feel of which are almost identical to the legitimate one. In this tutorial, I will be showing how to hack a facebook account through phishing.

SO, HOW TO HACK A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT?

There are few techniques by which you can hack a facebook account but here the easiest way we'll discuss.

REQUIREMENTS

  1. Phisher Creator ( Fake page generator)
  2. Hosting ( To host a fake page). Either you can purchase one or also can use free hosting like 110mb.com. But in free hosting, the account will be suspended after a few logins.

STEPS TO FOLLOW

  1. Download phisher creator and run it.
  2. As you run it, you'll see a screen like the shown below. Here you can type the fields as I have done. 
  3. Once you hit the Create Phisher button, it'll create a fake facebook index page and fb_login.php file in the output folder.
  4. Now you need to upload these both files index.html and fb_login.php to the hosting account.
  5. After uploading the file, open the index.html file path. It will open up a page like same facebook page as you can see below.
  6. We're all done, now we just need to copy the URL of our fake page and distribute it to the victims, you just have to trick them with your social engineering that how you convenience them to open this URL to login facebook. Once someone tries to login through your fake facebook page URL, you'll get their account username and password in the log_file.txt in the same directory of hosting where you have uploaded index.php and fb_login.php.
Hope it'll work fine for you and you have learned how to hack a facebook account. If you find any question or query related to this, feel free to comment below or you can also follow another way that might work well for you to hack facebook account.

More info


sexta-feira, 5 de junho de 2020

System Hacking: Password Cracking Techniques And Types Of Passwords


This blog based on two major concepts:
  • Understand password-cracking techniques
  • Understand different types of passwords
  •  

The simplest way to crack the passwords

The first step is to access the system is that you should know how to crack the password of the target system. Passwords are the key element of information require to access the system, and users also selects passwords that are easy to guess such as mostly people has a passwords of their pet's name or room number etc to help them remember it. Because of this human factor, most password guessing is successful if some information is known about the target. Information gathering and reconnaissance can help give away information that will help a hacker guess a user's password.

Once a password is guessed or cracked, it can be the launching point for escalating privileges, executing applications, hiding files, and covering tracks. If guessing a password fails, then passwords may be cracked manually or with automated tools such as a dictionary or brute-force method.

Types of Passwords 

  • Only numbers
  • Only letters
  • Only special characters
  • Letters and numbers
  • Only letters and special characters 
  • Numbers, letters and special characters
A strong password is less susceptible to attack by a hacker. The following rules, proposed by the EC-Council, should be applied when you're creating a password, to protect it against attacks:
  • Must not contain any part of the user's account name
  • Must have a minimum of eight characters
  • Must contain characters from at least three of the following categories:
    • Non alphanumeric symbols ($,:"%@!#)
    • Numbers
    • Uppercase letters
    • Lowercase letters
A hacker may use different types of attacks in order to identify a password and gain further access to a system. The types of password attacks are as follows:

Passive Online

​Eavesdropping on network password exchanges. Passive online attacks
include sniffing, man-in-the-middle, and replay attacks. Moreover, a passive online attack is also known as sniffing the password on a wired or wireless network. A passive attack is not detectable to the end user. The password is captured during the authentication process and can then be compared against a dictionary file or word list. User account passwords are commonly hashed or encrypted when sent on the network to prevent unauthorized access and use. If the password is protected by encryption or hashing, special tools in the hacker's toolkit can be used to break the algorithm.

Another passive online attack is known as man-in-the-middle (MITM). In a MITM attack, the hacker intercepts the authentication request and forwards it to the server. By inserting a sniffer between the client and the server, the hacker is able to sniff both connections and capture passwords in the process.

A replay attack is also a passive online attack; it occurs when the hacker intercepts the password en route to the authentication server and then captures and resend the authentication packets for later authentication. In this manner, the hacker doesn't have to break the password or learn the password through MITM but rather captures the password and reuses the password-authentication packets later to authenticate as the client.

Active Online

Guessing the Administrator password. Active online attacks include auto-
mated password guessing. Moreover, The easiest way to gain administrator-level access to a system is to guess a simple password assuming the administrator used a simple password. Password guessing is an active online attack. It relies on the human factor involved in password creation and only works on weak
passwords.

Assuming that the NetBIOS TCP 139 port is open, the most effective method of breaking into a Windows NT or Windows 2000 system is password guessing. This is done by attempting to connect to an enumerated share ( IPC$ or C$ ) and trying a username and password combination. The most commonly used Administrator account and password combinations are words like Admin, Administrator, Sysadmin, or Password, or a null password.
A hacker may first try to connect to a default Admin$ , C$ , or C:\Windows share. To connect to the hidden C: drive share, for example, type the following command in the Run field (Start ➪ Run):

\\ip_address\c$

Automated programs can quickly generate dictionary files, word lists, or every possible combination of letters, numbers, and special characters and then attempt to log on using those credentials. Most systems prevent this type of attack by setting a maximum number of login attempts on a system before the account is locked.

In the following sections, we'll discuss how hackers can perform automated password guessing more closely, as well as countermeasures to such attacks.

Performing Automated Password Guessing

To speed up the guessing of a password, hackers use automated tools. An easy process for automating password guessing is to use the Windows shell commands based on the standard NET USE syntax. To create a simple automated password-guessing script, perform the following steps:
  1. Create a simple username and password file using Windows Notepad. Automated tools such as the Dictionary Generator are available to create this word list. Save the file on the C: drive as credentials.txt.
  2. Pipe this file using the FOR command: C:\> FOR /F "token=1, 2*" %i in (credentials.txt)
  3. Type net use \\targetIP\IPC$ %i /u: %j to use the credentials.txt file to attempt to log on to the target system's hidden share.

Offline Attacks

Offline attacks are performed from a location other than the actual computer where the passwords reside or were used. Offline attacks usually require physical access to the computer and copying the password file from the system onto removable media. The hacker then takes the file to another computer to perform the cracking. Several types of offline password attacks exist.

Types of AttackCharacteristicsPassword Example
Dictionary attackAttempts to use passwords from a list of dictionary wordsAdministrator
Hybrid attackSubstitutes numbers of symbols for password charactersAdm1n1strator
Brute-force attackTries all possible combinations of letters, numbers, and special charactersMs!tr245@F5a

A dictionary attack is the simplest and quickest type of attack. It's used to identify a password that is an actual word, which can be found in a dictionary. Most commonly, the attack uses a dictionary file of possible words, which is hashed using the same algorithm used by the authentication process. Then, the hashed dictionary words are compared with hashed passwords as the user logs on, or with passwords stored in a file on the server. The dictionary attack works only if the password is an actual dictionary word; therefore, this type of attack has some limitations. It can't be used against strong passwords containing numbers or other symbols.

A hybrid attack is the next level of attack a hacker attempts if the password can't be found using a dictionary attack. The hybrid attack starts with a dictionary file and substitutes numbers and symbols for characters in the password. For example, many users add the number 1 to the end of their password to meet strong password requirements. A hybrid attack is designed to find those types of anomalies in passwords.

The most time-consuming type of attack is a brute-force attack, which tries every possible combination of uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols. A brute-force attack is the slowest of the three types of attacks because of the many possible combinations of characters in the password. However, brute force is effective; given enough time and processing power, all passwords can eventually be identified.

Read more


  1. Hacking Page
  2. Hacker
  3. Hacking Linux
  4. Pentest Android App
  5. Hacking Box
  6. Pentest Uk
  7. Pentest Book
  8. Hacking Ethics
  9. Pentestlab
  10. Hacking Apps
  11. Pentest Os
  12. Pentest News
  13. Hacking Programs
  14. Pentest Uk
  15. Hacking Programs